Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Citizen Warrior: Why the Peaceful Majority Might be Dangerous



Mubarka is a Canadian born woman of Pakistani parents. She grew up in Toronto among other Canadian children and attended university where she received a degree in commerce. Today she holds a prominent position with a transportation company.

Mubarka used to be as mainstream as any Canadian young adult can be; in fact, those who met her for the first time may have been struck by her vivacious personality. Her effervescence went hand in hand with her distinct Asian beauty which she shamelessly displayed with stylish clothing including the occasional low cut top. Mubarka used to converse for hours over topics as varied as business practices in Canadian politics to contemporary music.

It comes, therefore, as a shock, when one learns what path Mubarka has recently chosen for herself. She will be wedding a Pakistani man...a devout Muslim, whom she has never met but who was chosen for her when she was an infant. Not only that, but she has donned the Hijab for the first time in her life and is strictly observing Muslim tenets. She has chosen subservience to a man and subservience to his religion over the gender freedom offered her by the Western democracy she grew up in, and she's done so without so much as a whimper of protest.

When asked why she has picked the life of Sharia, Mubarka simply states that it is as Muhammad would will, and that there is no greater prophet than Muhammad. When asked how she will raise her children, Mubarka makes it clear...they will be raised as Muslims first, and Canadians second.

Hardi is perhaps one of the most pleasant Canadian women anyone could ever meet. In her capacity as a caregiver of seniors, she is gentle, loving, and incredibly patient. She laughs deliciously at the kind of comical moments that only seniors can deliver and her mood seems to be permanently stuck on happy. Hardi is an angel.

Those who encounter Hardi for the first time will be struck not by her character, that comes later, but by the fact that she is virtually covered from head to toe by traditional Indonesian Muslim attire. She covers her entire body with colourful costume that leaves only her hands and face exposed. Hardi is devout, in fact, so devout that during Christmas any appreciation given her by way of gifting must be void of any reference to the season. Furthermore, during quiet moments when Hardi is free to discuss her Muslim faith, it becomes clear she believes wholeheartedly in the strict observance of Sharia. For her, Islam in its pure non-secular form, is truth.

Both women are Muslims first and Canadians second. No matter how much respect one may have for either woman's character, there is little doubt where either would place her loyalty if faced with choosing between the Canadian traditions of liberty for all, or Sharia. There is also little doubt that if they were part of a majority, they would acquiesce to the demands of the Muslim clerical class and choose Sharia for all Canadians. [emphasis added]

It is therefore irrelevant in the grand scheme of things whether or not Hardi or Mubarka are "good" people; most people on the planet are, no matter their religion, race, or culture. What matters in the greater sense, is that as parts of the Muslim collective, neither woman would set aside her Muslim beliefs in order to safeguard and protect the full rights of non-Muslims to live as they choose. What's even more disturbing, is that both women have experienced the gender freedoms afforded them in Canada, yet both have voluntarily resigned themselves to the greater Muslim collective. [emphasis added]

As long as each woman is part of a small minority within Canada, she offers Canada much; but once she becomes part of a significant minority, or heaven forbid, a majority, she becomes dangerous. Why? Because Muslims wherever they form a majority choose Islamic norms over the broader more tolerant standards of the West. If given a chance, as has been clearly demonstrated the world over, they would unravel hundreds of years of hard fought human rights gains and replace them with the medieval practices of their faith. As such, both Hardi and Mubarka are simply bit players in a monstrous and destructive Muslim vortex that would drag civilization backwards hundreds of years. [emphasis added]

Source:   Citizen Warrior




























Monday, June 20, 2016

Shariah Law vs. the Constitution

First Amendment: Freedom of speech 

Constitution: First Amendment: Congress shall not abridge "the freedom of speech.” 

 Shariah: Speech defaming Islam or Muhammad is considered “blasphemy” and is punishable by death or imprisonment. 



The following is a small sample how anything depicting Islam in a bad light is being erased from America:

 
Dwight C. Holton, former U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon, emphasized that training materials for the FBI would be purged of everything politically incorrect: “I want to be perfectly clear about this: training materials that portray Islam as a religion of violence or with a tendency towards violence are wrong, they are offensive, and they are contrary to everything that this president, this attorney general and Department of Justice stands for. They will not be tolerated.”  [emphasis added]

Of course, the controversial training materials did not really claim that all Muslims are terrorists or that all terrorists are Muslims, and it is noteworthy that Cole had to resort to dismissive caricatures to make his point. For in taking this course, the Obama Administration is bowing to pressure from the Hamas-linked Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other Islamic advocacy groups.  [emphasis added]

 In a Los Angeles Times op-ed that appeared on the same day as the conference in Washington, Salam al-Marayati of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) roundly criticized existing training materials about jihad terror and demanded that the FBI and the Justice Department “issue a clear and unequivocal apology to the Muslim American community; establish a thorough and transparent vetting process in selecting its trainers and materials; invite experts who have no animosity toward any religion to conduct training about any religious community to law enforcement.”
Al-Marayati complained that training materials reflected “bigoted and inflammatory views on Muslims, including claims that ‘devout’ Muslims are more prone toward violence, that Islam aims to ‘transform a country’s culture into 7th century Arabian ways,’ that Islamic charitable giving is a ‘funding mechanism for combat’ and that the prophet Muhammad was a ‘violent cult leader.’”  [emphasis added]

Was Muhammad a “violent cult leader”? Certainly one definition of a cult is that members are not free to opt out if they choose to do so – and it was Muhammad who enunciated Islam’s notorious death penalty for apostasy by saying, “Whoever changes his Islamic religion, then kill him.” (Bukhari 9.84.57)

Source:  FrontPageMag

First Amendment: Freedom to dissent 

Constitution: First Amendment: “Congress cannot take away the right of the people "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Shariah: Non-Muslims are not to harbor any hostility toward the Islamic state or give comfort to those who disagree with Islamic  government.  
[emphasis added]



Following is one of many examples how non-Muslims are being told, dictated, forced and commanded not to harbor any hostility toward the Islamic state.  Also too, this goes along with  Any speech defaming Islam or Muhammad--which is  considered “blasphemy” and is punishable by death or imprisonment. 

From Breibert News:

U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch revealed Sunday that the government will release the transcripts of the 911 calls made by the Orlando terrorist during the attack last Sunday — scrubbed of any references to Islam or the Islamic State (ISIS).

 She told Chuck Todd on NBC News’ Meet the Press that the “FBI is releasing a partial [printed] transcript of the killer’s calls with law enforcement, from inside the club,” but added: “What we’re not going to do is further proclaim this man’s pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda.”   [emphasis added]


 
Second Amendment: Right to self-defense 

Constitution: Second Amendment: "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." 

Shariah: Under historic and modern dhimmi laws, non-Muslims cannot possess swords, firearms or weapons of any kind. 


*~*~*~*~*~*~*

As all of you already know, the United States government has been working diligently to take away our right to bear arms.    They do this under the guise of the deaths caused by people with guns.   And while that may be part of their passion to do away with this Amendment...it is an enormously small fraction of the truth.   

How can you tell?  One of the many ways is  all the illegals they keep bringing in by the thousands.  This is a major indicator.  


The other, needless to say more important,  way you can tell  is how all the guns that somehow magically appear on the streets and in the hands of the untrained, uneducated and irresponsible people; in the hands of criminal gang bangers and gang banger wanna be's; in the hands of repeat felons; in the hands of the "mentally incompetent";  in the hands of terrorists.

The Democrats blame the N.R.A.  But if it were true that the N.R.A. is to blame for all the gun violence in America, then how do they explain all the illegal weaponry confiscated from criminals on the streets?


Do the math!  Decide for yourselves!

Keep in mind, this current administration has betrayed America and all Americans, and I dare to say it-- the entire world!  This administration has betrayed and continues to betray America and Americans by blatantly ignoring Americans who are homeless, going without needed medicines, going without proper & decent medical care.   This administration continuously turns a blind eye to our veterans who are homeless, going without medical care, etc.   All in favor of taking in countless thousands of "refugees" providing them with free housing, medical care, food and even vehicles!  But don't take my word for it...research these things out for yourselves.    


While I am not opposed to helping those from other countries, I am definitely opposed to putting them above and ahead of our own.  As the old saying goes...charity begins at home!

And this nonsense of blaming Bush is nothing more than a smoke screen the Democrats use and continue to  hide behind.  Interestingly enough, the word Jihad was not in our every day vocabulary when Bush was in office.   Ever since Obama took office...all of us have come to know the words and the meaning of Jihad, ISIL, Islamic State and Sharia.  Think about that one for a good long minute.  

As always...I leave it up to you to decide for yourselves.   And too, I urge you to research and study as much as you can.  Educate yourselves thoroughly.   Don't be caught off guard!